The Causal Theory
The
Causal Theory is a progressive, if controversial, theory
based upon cause and effect. It assumes that there are
no genetic causes for behavior. Rather, it assumes that
personality and behavior, including and especially adult behavior,
result from childhood experiences beginning from birth, and
perhaps even before. It
includes attachment theory, lessons from trauma theory, family
systems theory, and some behavioral and cognitive models.
I imagine it has a splash of Zen, as well.
It’s
an assumption which pays off in many ways. Of course, the easier
assumption is genetics. First,
Causal Theorists don't dismiss anything as inborn. We seek to understand
what we see, and, consequently, we can see behavior more clearly than those who
believe in genetics in partly, because everything
we see is meaningful to us and healable, as well. We look at all behaviors as
clues which can inform us as to what has been wonderful in a person's life and
what needs to be corrected and perhaps even how to go about that task.
I have actually been developing evidence to demonstrate that Causal
Theorists see children and behavior more clearly than those who believe in the
genetics with influences from nurture.
When
you believe that personality is created not born, you take more responsibility
as a parent. It’s like a chef who
tastes his food as he prepares it to see how it’s developing.
If a parent keeps an eye on how her child is turning out, she can adjust
the child in time for greatness, ethics and love of life. So, The Causal Theory
informs us how to raise a Miracle Child, how to heal a traumatized child, and
how to correct our own adaptations which no longer work.
The good news is that the theory is not just practical, it is also
supported by research. Recent research has both debunked previous
claims that genetics caused behaviors at all and produced new research showing
once again a correlation between abuse, failed attachments, neglect and
repression as ingredients for personality and behavioral problems.
The more extreme the childhood trauma, the more extreme the results. Research
which claimed to find a gay gene, a depressed or anxious gene, an alcoholic gene
or even a schizophrenic gene, have been exposed for deceptive designs and sloppy
procedure. Instead, large amounts of careful research have demonstrated
that attachment, trauma, and other forms of parenting correlate with identifiable symptoms
and behavior, including schizophrenia.
Of
course, we know that Down Syndrome is genetic.
We know that fetal alcohol syndrome, although not genetic, has medical
and long term consequences in the creation of the mind and body of the child.
However, these are not personality and behavioral anomalies.
Personality forms around interaction neurologists say.
Down Syndrome and fetal alcohol syndrome are medical issues, not
psychological ones. Yet, psychiatry has long been trying to medicalize mental
illness to keep it under their domain. This
serves a giant population of defensive parents and an economic power structure
that includes pharmacology and research endeavors, probably the greatest of
which was the Human Genome Project. I
tend to doubt the Causal Theory, attachment theory or trauma theory will ever
inspire such generous research grants.
You hit the controversy on the head. I
know it sounds like we’re blaming parents for how their child turns out, and
this could be really hard to hear, when you’ve done everything you knew to do
and you’ve been the best parent you could be.
Unfortunately, all the information isn’t out there for how to be the
best possible parent. That’s why I
wrote the Causal Theory of parenting and self awareness.
If you know that your child is the way she is because of her history,
it’s not too late to fix it. Better
late than never.
Also,
please keep in mind that all parents were children too.
We all turn out the way we do in order to adapt brilliantly to our own
childhoods. It’s just that, as
wonderfully as we adapted to our families or origin, they don’t turn out to be
like the world at large. We have to
readjust or unlearn and relearn, which is a journey into self-awareness.
We’re
not parent-bashing, although I know that parent’s can have fragile
egos. I think there
is more defensiveness around parenting than how we perform in
bed, another real sensitive area.
Nobody likes to be critiqued in bed or for their parenting.
This is delicate material.
However, parents who are willing to get guidance can
raise the most amazing, or even more amazing children, so it’s
worth swallowing our pride.
The payoff is there.
And what’s pride anyway but a complicated marketing problem?
Home
Copyright © 2007
Content property of Faye Snyder unless otherwise noted. Original
content may not be removed without permission. Website design
by LKYZ13 Design, Maintained by DiggsDesign